> To recap, our facial recognition authentication required 1) the user’s mobile phone, and 2) their selfie. We omitted crucial research on both fronts.
So point #1 failed because the work phone is not considered to be "something they have", a "possession", correct?
Thank you for sharing, insightful story! (and very painful at the time, I imagine!)
> To recap, our facial recognition authentication required 1) the user’s mobile phone, and 2) their selfie. We omitted crucial research on both fronts.
So point #1 failed because the work phone is not considered to be "something they have", a "possession", correct?
Thank you for sharing, insightful story! (and very painful at the time, I imagine!)